About Me

Name: NOTLEGALROADKILLYET
Biography
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

2008 Presidential Contest

The fact is that I am going to vote for a Republican for President in 2008.  Colorado has next to no influence on who that Republican will be. 

I hope it is not John McCain.  I think he is untrustworthy.  This McCain-Feingold business soured me on him.

I hadn't thought that Rudy Giuliani had much of a chance to get through the primaries, given his personal, as opposed to his public record.  Lightning might strike.  Today, Vincent Carroll of the Rocky Mountain News has made some points worth considering: 

But if you really want evidence of Giuliani's credentials as a credible Republican candidate, you need to know only this single fact: In the 1990s, the political left in New York despised him. They demonized him without pause, while peddling hysteria about the calamitous effects his supposedly mean-spirited policies would usher in (but didn't).

Put it this way: Even if Giuliani is unacceptable to the social conservatives who dominate the GOP's base, they ought to give the man his due. No candidate so far in the running has jousted more with their own enemies, and none boasts more victories to his credit, either.

If Giuliani gets the nomination, will Colorado Values Voters see their way to vote for him, or will they simply choose not to vote as happened with Coors and Beauprez? 

Make no mistake.  I'm not lobbying for Giuliani (or anyone else) to get the nomination, but regardless of who gets it, I want to see full throated support from all Colorado Republicans. 

If Republicans think "moderate" Governor Ritter is giving them heartburn, wait until they see what "moderate" President Hillary will be passing out.

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (1) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

The Rocky Mountain News is Helping Me

. . . in my very easy task of discrediting the Denver Post editorial board.
 
The Denver Post almost never thinks its editorial positions through thoroughly.  They brought us the "moderate" Bill Ritter, the DA Carol Chambers Show Trial, and Amendment 41.  We will let Vince Carroll of the Rocky Mountain News take it from here:

Amendment 41, The Denver Post acknowledged Wednesday, was "plagued by vague wording, as citizen initiatives often are . . ."

Would this be the same Amendment 41 that the Post endorsed less than four months ago? Yes, indeed - and with nary a word of warning as to the muddiness of the text.

By the way, the amendment's chief financial backer, Jared Polis, is more direct. He now acknowledges the amendment is "poorly worded" (not vaguely worded), which is true. There is nothing whatever vague, after all, about an amendment that bars government workers, spouses and dependents from accepting any "gift or thing of value" unless it is "given by an individual who is a relative or personal friend of the recipient on a special occasion" (my emphasis). This is the draconian pure essence of the measure the Post freely chose to support, and which it now insists the legislature must defang by ignoring the plain meaning of its language.

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Ritter Has the Ethics of a Lawyer

The Denver Post has a well written, well researched article on HB 1072, the labor law that has the whole business community in Colorado up in arms.

You can see the mind of a lawyer at work in the first four paragraphs. 
They didn't ask, so I didn't tell them.

Gov. Bill Ritter may have been surprised by the speed with which a controversial bill to change state labor law hit his desk. But he certainly knew it was coming - his campaign promises helped set it in motion.

"He said if the bill came across his desk he would sign it," said Ed Bagwell, head of Teamsters Local 2004 in Denver.

It's a pledge that apparently was well-known in labor circles but nowhere else, sparking the fury that has dominated the Democrat's first month in office and set up one of his first official acts as a high-profile test of loyalty.

Business leaders, some of whom supported Ritter over Republican Bob Beauprez, never asked Ritter where he stood on proposals to eliminate one of the two votes needed for unions to negotiate all-union shops.

"Business never asked me about it," Ritter said in a recent interview. "They were pretty much focused on the things that (Republican former Gov. Bill) Owens had seen. And my recollection is Gov. Owens had never been confronted with the issues involving the Labor Peace Act."

Ritter is no moderate, and he has the ethics of a lawyer-none.

But don't worry.  The Democratic legislative leadership has been caught in its own lie:

While legislative leaders have denied the bill was given any special status, Colorado AFL-CIO president Steve Adams said he pushed for quick passage in order to send a strong message.

"I actually think it was our idea to run (the legislation) quickly and quietly. We wanted to kind of demonstrate to our workers that life's a whole lot better with Democrats in charge," he said. "Obviously, there was some miscalculation on the quiet part."

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Colorado HB 1227

State Representative Ken Summers, R-Lakewood has introduced HB 1227, a bill that, if enacted, will cut back on the incestiousness involved in the appointment of the Judicial Retention Commission that grades the Supreme Court.

Believe it or not, the Chief Justice currently appoints about one third of the board which would recommend (or not) her retention. 

I find it disturbing that not one of the Colorado Springs legislators finds this important enough to co-sponsor.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Time for a Laugh

At one point, I wanted to include lawyer and law jokes in this blog, just to lighten it up.  There is so much serious stuff to write about that it seems I never have the time.  Today, I ran across a bit of humor that is worth sharing:

What do retired people do all day?

Working people frequently ask retired people what they do to make their days interesting.

Well, for example, the other day I went into town and went into a shop.  I was only in thre for about 5 minutes. 

When I came out there was a cop writing a parking ticket.  I went up to him and said "Come on man, how about giving a senior citizen a break?"

He ignored me and continued writing the ticket.  I called him a Nazi.  He glared at me and started writing another ticket for having worn tires.  So I called him a s---head.  He finished the second ticket and put it on the windshield with the first.  Then he started writing a third.  The more I abused him, the more tickets he wrote.

Personally, I didn't care.  I came into town by bus.

I try to have a little fun each day now that I am retired.  It's important at my age.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

How Soon Will Muslim Lawsuits Cross the Atlantic?

I find it interesting that Muslims would prefer to ignore the western court system except when they think they can use it to their own advantage. 

Remember the Danish cartoons depicting Allah?  You know, the ones that stirred riots throughout the Muslim world.

The BBC is reporting that two French Muslim groups are suing Charlie Hebdo magazine for defamation over the cartoons, printed a year ago. . . 

The groups - Paris Mosque and the Union of Islamic Organisations of France - say the magazine "insulted people on the basis of religion" in a case seen as a test of free speech. . .

The two-day trial is being seen as a test of the boundaries of free speech and religious sensitivities in France.

In republishing the cartoons, Liberation called the trial "idiotic", adding: "It is not words which wound, or pictures that kill. It is bombs."

Muslim groups also tried to sue in Denmark, where the cartoons originated, but were rebuffed.  It will be interesting to see if this phenomena makes it across the Atlantic, and if it does, how quickly these groups are shown the door.

Thanks to overlawyered.com.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

A 1072 Time Line-a Payoff?

Bestdestiny has a very interesting time line for Colorado House Bill 1072.  His implied theory is that its passage is a payoff for the Democratic Convention coming to town.  If this is a payoff, it is very expensive indeed:

January 3 MSNBC.com: “A local labor official received a call Tuesday from AFL-CIO President John Sweeney, asking what it would take to overcome union objections to bringing the Democratic National Convention to the Pepsi Center.”

“…..local labor unions feel as if Democratic politicians are happy to take their contributions during elections but aren’t willing to help them organize job sites.”

January 11 Democratic National Committee announced that Denver will host the 2008 Democratic National Convention

January 14 Denver Post “National union officials have assured Democrats that the stagehands’ issues with the Pepsi Center can be resolved over the next 19 months. But how?”

January 15 House Bill 1072 sails through its first committee in the House

Bestdestiny's permalink isn't working properly, so my link is to his site rather than the specific post. 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Holy Cow! Colorado Republicans on the Internet

In making my sweep through the blogs I monitor, I stumbled on an announcement that there was a new Colorado Senate Republican web site.  It came into existence about ten days ago.

(Edited to add:  There is another Colorado Senate web site that published for a few days in January and has no entries beyond Feb 1.  I'm confused.)

I spent about an hour going through it.  It is a giant step forward.  The writing is good.  It goes into some (but not enough) detail about floor debates.  Its coverage of the issues is outstanding.  It connects to the web pages of those senators who have their own web pages.

My small criticism is that its photographs are consistently amateurish. The quality, cropping, lighting, etc., is bad enough that I would suggest that Republican Senators would be better off with no photographs at all than the ones they are using.

I have added it to my favorites list and my blogroll. 

Now, if only they can find someone to through each Senator's personal web site and clean it up.

At some point, I will write up some suggestions for modifications.  One immediate one would be to identify Republican bloggers who write every day and list them as resources, a Republican blogroll, if you please.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Salazar Dropping Moderate Mask

This blog predicted that Colorado Senator Ken Salazar would pretend to be "moderate" only so long as he was in the minority in the US Senate.

Over the last 24 hours Salazar has gone on a one-sided attack on Senate Republicans, claiming that they won't allow a vote on a non-binding Democratic Resolution.  What the Denver Post fails to mention, and what Salazar would like Colorado voters not to know is that the Republicans have a resolution of their own. 

The Republicans have made it plain that if they get a vote on their resolution, the Democrats will get a vote on theirs.  The Democrats want no part of allowing the Republican resolution up for a vote.  They are counting on their Mainstream left leaning media allies to provide one-sided cover for their actions, and, as usual, they are getting it.

This kind of one sided coverage of a major national issue is a disgraceful mockery.  The Denver Post should be ashamed, as should Senator Salazar.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

A Thought on Nuclear Energy

The Al Knight editorial mentioned in the previous essay named several important benefits of nuclear power:

Nuclear power plants . . .do not generate greenhouse gases. The nation already has 100 or so of these plants. Together they generate about 20 percent of the country's electrical power. People like President Bush want to build more of them, both as a way to reduce the dependence on foreign oil and as a way to reduce man-made effects on climate change. . .

More nuclear plants would improve the convenience and therefore the use of electric or hybrid cars, reducing air pollution in the bargain. More electric and hybrid cars would reduce dependence on foreign oil.

When you think about the Greenhouse gas issue, the Democrat party has promoted a problem without a solution. 

Other than President Bush, I have yet to see a Republican politician promoting nuclear power in Colorado.  I wonder if that is a mistake.

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Finally, A Denver Post Editorial Worth Reading

The Denver Post is slipping.  Today, it published an editorial by Al Knight, "Sierra Club still rigidly 'no nukes'" which sanely lays out the Sierra Club's insane energy positions.

The Sierra club opposes oil, coal, and nuclear energy sources, and hell will freeze over before it changes that position. 

In Al Knight's words:

What the Sierra Club seeks is a commitment by the American people to abandon development of adequate energy sources in the hope that other sources might be developed before the economy collapses.

As you read this editorial, keep in mind that the environmental lobby is a major source of both the funding and the thinking of the loony left . . . err the Democrat party.

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

My Personal Pragmatic Politics

I am a pragmatic conservative.  I admit that there aren't many of us around.  I am not, never have been, and never will be a one issue voter, though I admit to being a one party voter. 

I am not in love with the position that I am pushing-that to become more conservative the party has to tolerate more moderate candidates-at least long enough to regain control of the redistricting machinery.  Even so, I don't see another route back to long term Republican political power. 

If I am to be pragmatic, I have to push that position.

If someone has a better path back to power in Colorado, I will provide a forum.  Better yet, start your own blog.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (2) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Darvin Dowdy Writes

Darvin Dowdy added a comment to my "Congratulations in order" post:

Huh. No mention...of the border issue. No mention of Ignacio Ramos or Jose Compean. I've heard all I need to hear. I fully expect Texas to go "blue" come 2008. Not what I want but what I expect. The GOP is so far out of touch with their base. Especially in Texas.
Just look at what happened on 11/7/06. Rick Perry wins w/only 38% of the vote. Pitiful! Approximately 60% of the voters voted against the GOP. The Dem candidate took about 30% - much more than had been expected. Yet these number don't seem to say anything to Texas or national GOP hierarchy. Its unbelievable how divorced from reality they really are. DD


I'm not sure I made clear what happened last Saturday.  While they didn't mention it in their platform, the folks who support the positions DD wants emphasized won.  They deserved to win.  They were organized and put together a slate of candidates that appealed to the majority of the people who were there and could vote.

At this point, I have no idea if the outcome was good or bad for the party.  El Paso County is the key to any Republican win state wide, which gives it an out sized voice.  

It is far more conservative than almost any other county in the state.

Some El Paso activists think they are arborists, rather than team players.  That is, they believe that if a moderate Republican wins in a moderate district anywhere in the state, they have an obligation to cut his career off and replace him with either a Democrat or a conservative, and they don't really care which.

If the Republicans are ever to regain the majority in the legislature, we have to match candidates with districts.  Yes, that would make the Republican party more moderate statewide, and even in El Paso County (due to Gerrymandering). 

Republican majorities, even more moderate majorities, are important because they would keep the really dumb anti-business legislation that we are currently seeing off the Democratic Governor's desk.

So, that brings us to the question I tried to ask in the last post.  Are the twenty-three folks who got elected pragmatic enough to promote candidates who can win in their districts?  If they are not, if they only want promote feel good, but unelectable conservatives in liberal districts, then the party is doomed to be a minority in a state where it enjoys a registration advantage. 

That would be the epitome of mismanagement.  Only time will tell.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Congratulations in Order

On Saturday, February 3, the El Paso Republicans elected the following officers:

Greg Garcia, Chair
Dane Nowels, Vice Chair
Dick MacLeod, Secretary

The following Bonus Members were also elected:

Chuck Broerman
Robert C. Balink
Richard (Reb) Williams
Andy Merritt
Nathan Fisk
Reginald Perry
Bentley Rayburn
Wayne Williams *
Bob McCoombs *
Bob Shrillia *

Nancy Meadows
Sharon Adams
Vickie Broerman
Amy Lathen
Lynda Ryan
Judith Jergesen
Cami Bremer
Debbi Rayburn
Cheri Ofner *
Robin Coran *

"The platform that most ran on is as follows:  "We commit to renewing the El Paso County Republican Party by promoting family values, personal responsibility, individual rights, limited government, strong military, and free markets.  We will work diligently to find, support, and elect candidates who will protect and defend our Republican platform.  It is our intention to create a vision which will unite our county party and return it to preeminence among Republican counties in the United States."

The folks who were elected who did not run on this platform are marked with an *

It will be interesting to see if the words  "We will work diligently to find, support, and elect candidates who will protect and defend our Republican platform" mean that the candidates who ran on this platform have an interest in finding legislative candidates whose politics match their potential legislative districts and thus are electable. 

Without electable candidates, the commitment to "renew" the county party is worse than hollow.  It is an unfunny joke.  The acid test will be to see who is recruited to run in Merrifield's district.  It isn't too early to find an electable candidate to run against John Morse, either.

With luck, I have eliminated all of the name spelling errors.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (1) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (1) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Ritter is Still a "Moderate?"

To hear the Denver Post tell it today, Governor Bill Ritter is still a moderate who was elected with both labor and business support.

Even so, by signing this legislation
[House Bill 1072] he risks losing business support on those portions of Ritter's "Colorado promise" that are key to the state's future.

When Ritter signs this bill, as he most certainly will, the Denver Post and the Rocky Mountain News will immediately lose credibility with moderate voters and the business community, and they know it.  It isn't Ritter's credibility they are concerned with, it is their own.

I can't wait until SB 10 (Nursing) starts moving.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (3) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive